首页> 外文OA文献 >Comparison of teaching two methods of physical education with grade one pupils
【2h】

Comparison of teaching two methods of physical education with grade one pupils

机译:两种体育教学方法与一年级学生教学比较

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Five groups of grade one boys and girls (29 pupils in each group) were compared in physical fitness, perceptual motor development and creative ability at the conclusion of a five month program. Each group followed a different program: (a) the informal method four times a week, (b) the formal method four times a week, (c) the informal method twice a week, (d) the formal method twice a week, and (e) no physical education at all. There were no significant differences among the five groups in physical fitness and perceptual motor development at the beginning of the study. The findings of this study would appear to warrant the conclusions that at the five percent level of significance the methods and frequencies followed in this study: (a) do not vary in their effect on perceptual motor development, (b) are equally better than no physical education at all in the development of physical fitness, (c) are less effective 1n the development of creative ability than no physical education at all, and (d) have the same effect on boys as they do on girls.
机译:在为期五个月的计划结束时,对五组一年级的男孩和女孩(每组29个学生)的身体素质,感知运动能力和创造能力进行了比较。每个小组遵循不同的计划:(a)每周四次非正式方法,(b)每周四次正式方法,(c)每周两次非正式方法,(d)每周两次正式方法,以及(e)完全没有体育教育。在研究开始时,五组在身体适应性和知觉运动发育方面无显着差异。这项研究的结果似乎可以得出以下结论:在5%的显着性水平上,研究中采用的方法和频率:(a)对感觉运动发育的影响没有变化,(b)比没有更好体育在身体适应发展中的作用,(c)在创造能力发展中的作用要比根本没有体育锻炼要差,并且(d)对男孩的作用与对女孩的作用相同。

著录项

  • 作者

    Scott, Robert;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 1965
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 en_US
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号